Tennessee Supreme Court· 6/16/1975
Kersey v. State
Citations
- 525 S.W.2d 139
- 1975 Tenn. LEXIS 654
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that such an inquiry is reversible error
- “[T]he minority should listen to the views of the majority with the disposition of being convinced.”
- “We view these charges as being tantamount to a judicially mandated majority verdict which is impermissible under Tennessee law.”
- “[T]he jury may be asked whether it believes it might reach a verdict after further deliberations. If the trial judge feels that further deliberations might be productive, he may give supplemental instructions....”
- “Strict adherence is expected[,] and variations will not be permissible.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henry, Fones, Cooper, Brock, Harbison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.