Skip to main content
· 8/31/1992

Kerrigan v. Magnum Entertainment, Inc.

Citations

  • 804 F. Supp. 733
  • 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1557
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16245
  • 60 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 290
  • 1992 WL 301568

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is clear that when a remedy is available under Title VII or [state statutes], an action for wrongful discharge will not lie in Maryland.”
  • “It is clear when a remedy is available under Title VII or [Maryland Fair Employment Practices Law], an action for wrongful discharge will not lie in Maryland.”
  • “It is clear that when a remedy is available under Title VII or [Maryland Fair Employment Practices Law], an action for wrongful discharge will not lie in Maryland.”
  • “It is clear that when a remedy is available under Title VII or [MD. CODE ANN., STATE GOV’T § 20], an action for wrongful discharge will not lie in Maryland.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Legg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.