· 8/31/1992
Kerrigan v. Magnum Entertainment, Inc.
Citations
- 804 F. Supp. 733
- 7 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1557
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16245
- 60 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 290
- 1992 WL 301568
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is clear that when a remedy is available under Title VII or [state statutes], an action for wrongful discharge will not lie in Maryland.”
- “It is clear when a remedy is available under Title VII or [Maryland Fair Employment Practices Law], an action for wrongful discharge will not lie in Maryland.”
- “It is clear that when a remedy is available under Title VII or [Maryland Fair Employment Practices Law], an action for wrongful discharge will not lie in Maryland.”
- “It is clear that when a remedy is available under Title VII or [MD. CODE ANN., STATE GOV’T § 20], an action for wrongful discharge will not lie in Maryland.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Legg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.