Kerr v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the insurer was not required to obtain a new written waiver of UM coverage when the wife, who was listed on the policy as an additional insured, was substituted as the “named insured” in place of the deceased husband
• the court’s holding was based on a statute that provided that no new offer of coverage was required with a renewal policy
• \[T]he test for whether a new rejection of UM coverage had to be obtained is whether the original policy has been changed in any material respect.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).