Kerr v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where court wrote that “[wjhen a defendant’s explanation is not indisputably reasonable and requires an assessment of credibility and other factors, the [statutory] presumption may not vanish entirely” after a defendant testifies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-24· cited 9×
• L.S. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-07-24

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Young
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1968-12-10· cited 103×
• R. A. L. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-09-01· cited 35×
• T.S.R. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-03· cited 28×
• Haugabrook v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-11· cited 20×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-13· cited 19×
• Wilson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-14· cited 14×
• Bertone v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-21· cited 8×
• Dellechiaie v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-09-04· cited 6×
• Interest of M.M. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-02-14· cited 6×