Kerr v. Palmieri

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \There is nothing in the argument that the grounds stated in the [rule 59 ] motion are insufficient. The motion did not need to specify any ground\
• “statute relating] to the admissibility of evidence is . .. procedural”
• \statute relat[ing] to the admissibility of evidence is ... procedural\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).