Kerr v. Martin
Citations
- 122 Pa. 436
- 15 A. 860
- 1888 Pa. LEXIS 620
Syllabus
<p>Where, contrary to the provisions of a rule of court, the sheriff of a county has become the surety upon a recognizance for an appeal from an award of arbitrators, it is error to strike off the appeal, regular in other respects, without a rule upon the appellant to perfect his recognizance : Means v. Trout, 16 S. & R. 349, followed; Carr v. McGovern,. 66 Pa. 458. distinguished.</p>
Judges: Clare, Gordon, Green, Hand, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lentz v. Kittanning Real Estate Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1919-07-17· cited 14×
- Carbaugh v. SandersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1900-04-23· cited 13×
- Sturtz v. CounonieBedford County Court of Common Pleas· 1945-06-19· cited 2×
- Armour v. LeshefkaSchuylkill County Court of Common Pleas· 1928-02-27
- Erdley v. HarpsterCentre County Court of Common Pleas· 1928-07-10
- Adams v. MillerNorthampton County Court of Common Pleas· 1934-09-17
- Crouse v. NovaseckuDauphin County Court of Common Pleas· 1949-09-12
- Milides v. VlahakisNorthampton County Court of Common Pleas· 1951-10-08
- Lefcourt AppealBucks County Court of Common Pleas· 1970-02-05
- Hallam v. Minnemeyer-Thompson Motor Co.Washington County Court of Common Pleas· 1930-09-29
- Frecon v. MumperAdams County Court of Common Pleas· 1936-11-05
- Gharet v. JohnsonClinton County Court of Common Pleas· 1923-06-20
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Other cases named Kerr v. Martin
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.