Kerr v. Kurtz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that plaintiff’s complaint did 19 not provide any dates or sufficient facts which would make it “difficult for defendants to frame an 20 answer[.]”
• recognizing that unduly long and confusing pleadings 27 “impose unfair burdens on litigants and judges”
• holding that failure to comply with Rule 8 is independent basis for dismissal even when complaint is not “wholly without merit”
• ruling that plaintiff’s 16 complaint did not provide any dates or sufficient facts which would make it “difficult for 17 defendants to frame an answer[.]”
• holding that a Complaint must “fully set[] 5 forth who is being sued, for what relief, and on what theory, with enough detail to guide 6 discovery”
• holding that a complaint must “fully se[t] 22 forth who is being sued, for what relief, and on what theory, with enough detail to guide 23 discovery”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).