Skip to main content
· 12/7/1945

Kerr-Gifford & Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 15 Cust. Ct. 187
  • 1945 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that, if “the court determines that the city has violated the statute, the court will have the opportunity to consider whether [the] plaintiffs are entitled to supplemen- tal remedies permitted by ORS 28.080”
  • observing that, if “the court determines that the city has violated the statute, the court will have the opportunity to consider whether [the] plaintiffs are entitled to supplemen- tal remedies permitted by ORS 28.080”
  • recognizing ORS 12.140 as the “residual” stat- ute of limitations
  • ORS 12.140 is a statute of limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cline, Ekwall, Keefe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.