Skip to main content

Kerns v. Methodist Hospital

Citations

  • 574 A.2d 1068
  • 393 Pa. Super. 533
  • 1990 Pa. Super. LEXIS 914

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a party opposing summary judgment on the grounds that discovery is incomplete must establish that the requested discovery is material
  • applying Feld to address the plaintiff’s claim that the security program for the protection of staff, patients, and visitors implemented by a hospital was inadequate
  • applying Feld to address the plaintiff’s claim that the security program for the protection of staff, patients, and visitors implemented by a hospital was inadequate
  • summary judgment not premature despite outstanding discovery requests, where proposed discovery would not further inquiry
  • lack of duty to protect deliveryman from unanticipated third-party attack at nursing residence owned by hospital
  • lack of duty to protect deliveryman from unanticipated third-party attack at nursing residence owned by hospital

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cirillo, Kelly, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.