· 6/24/1986
Kern Oil and Refining Co., Plaintiff/counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Tenneco Oil Co., Defendant/counterclaimant-Appellant
Citations
- 792 F.2d 1380
- 1 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 651
- 5 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 592
- 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 26361
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that, in diversity cases, both the availability and amount of attorneys’ fees 26 are governed by state law
- finding prejudicial forum shopping where the plaintiff sought to avoid a specific 4| judge
- affirming, as within the trial court’s “sound discretion,” dismissal of claim with prejudice
- permitting district court's pretrial order to govern recovery of attorneys' fees
- permitting district court’s pretrial order to govern recovery of attorneys’ fees
- permitting district court’s pretrial order to govern recovery of attorneys’ fees
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Beezer, Brunetti
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.