Kern County Farm Bureau v. Allen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to reopen notice-and-comment where new/undisclosed information did “not provide the sole, essential support for the [agency] decision”
• agency may use supplementary data not previously available “so long as no prejudice is shown”
• “Absent superior data occasional imperfections do not violate” the ESA best available data standard
• thoroughly reviewing three post-comment studies and FWS’s treatment of those studies to determine whether they “provide[d] the sole, essential support for” or “merely supplemented” the data used to support a listing decision
• thoroughly reviewing three post-comment studies and FWS’s treatment of those studies to determine whether they “provide[d] the sole, essential support for” or “merely supplemented” the data used to support a listing decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).