Kermans v. Pendleton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• act in shooting bar patron clearly establishes intent to harm
• act in shooting bar patron clearly establishes intent to harm
• exclusion applied when insured owner of bar shot patron because owner ‘‘was engaged in his business pursuit at the time of the shoot- ing and . . . but for this business pursuit, the shooting would not have occurred’’; shooting incident was related to physical safety of bar and its patrons

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).