Skip to main content
· 1/13/2014

Kerman v. Comm'r

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 904
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 778
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3404
  • 571 U.S. 1126
  • 2014 WL 102428
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 537

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[A] prisoner may not file what amounts to a motion for reconsideration under the guise of a separate and purportedly new application when the new application raises the same claim that was raised and rejected in the prior application.\
  • Rosenbaum and Jill Pryor, JJ., concurring in result
  • Rosenbaum and Jill Pryor, JJ., concurring in result
  • Rosenbaum and Jill Pryor, JJ., concurring in result
  • Rosenbaum and Jill Pryor, JJ., concurring in result
  • Rosenbaum and Jill Pryor, J.J., concurring

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.