Kergil v. Central Oregon Fir Supply Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that evidence the parties entered into a lease agreement for the purpose of avoiding the payment of taxes and to mislead a third party could show that the parties never intended the written instrument to be a binding agreement
• all holding that evidence that an ostensibly fully integrated writing is a “sham” designed to mislead third parties is not admissible under the parol evidence rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).