Keppy v. Lilienthal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering that one party “entered the agreement in order to revitalize their [swine] herd and earn money”
• discussing the district court’s finding that an oral contract with no express duration was “intended ... to be in effect until [the] herd [of pigs] could be revitalized and the parties could make a profit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).