Skip to main content
· 11/10/1992

Kepple v. Fairman Drilling Co.

Citations

  • 615 A.2d 1298
  • 532 Pa. 304
  • 1992 Pa. LEXIS 498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that notice to attorney general is not required when contending statute is unconstitutional as applied
  • holding appellant waived facial constitutional challenge to statute by failing to notify attorney general under Rule 521
  • noting that notice to Attorney General is not required if appellant’s argument is confined only to application and not attack on constitutionality of statute on its face
  • distinguishing between facial and as-applied constitutional challenges for purposes of providing notification to Attorney General pursuant to Pa. R.A.P. 521(a)
  • distinguishing between facial and as-applied constitutional challenges for purposes of providing notification to Attorney General pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 521(a)
  • finding waiver under Rule 521 where the Attorney General was not provided with notice of a facial challenge to a statute’s constitutionality

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.