Keplinger v. Mid-Century Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the exclusion was inapplicable to an insured vehicle used to deliver newspapers because the vehicle itself was not held out for public use
• “The purpose of a ‘drive other cars’ provision is to cover the occasional or incidental use of other cars without the payment of an additional premium, but concomitantly, to exclude habitual use of others cars which would increase the insurer’s risk without a corresponding increase in premium.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).