Keown v. Holman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Doub, 233 S.E.2d at 114, in holding insurance agent was entitled to a directed verdict on claim he negligently failed to renew policy where insured would 27 have learned of expiration date had he read the policy
• in an action against an insurance agent for negligent failure to renew a policy, the insured was contributorily negligent because he was aware the policy would expire soon and failed to examine the policy to ascertain the expiration date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).