Kenyon Ltd. Partnership v. 1372 Kenyon Street Northwest Tenants' Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that entity could not have established a lack of meaningful choice because it was “a sophisticated group, represented by counsel” that entered a contract “for the purpose of taking advantage of” its benefits
• “Whether a contract term is unconscionable is determined as of the time the contract is made.”
• party’s unconscionability claim, which rested on “circumstances[] as they developed after the contract was executed,” failed where he “knew or should have known of the risk” existing at the time of contract formation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).