Kentucky Traction & Terminal Co. v. Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that O’Connor and Walsh were entitled to absolute immunity from malicious prosecution claim and that Walsh and Sidaras were entitled to absolute immunity from First Amendment retaliation claim
• holding that O’Connor and Walsh were entitled to absolute immunity from malicious prosecution claim and that Walsh and Sidaras were entitled to absolute immunity from First Amendment retaliation claim
• finding that absolute prosecutorial immunity barred First Amendment retaliation claims when alleged retaliatory action was taken in prosecutors’ capacity as advocates
• dismissing declaratory judgment claims that lacked an independent basis for subject matter jurisdiction and declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims
• \A claim premised on an official policy or custom cannot be sustained on one alleged violation.\
• prosecution based on facially insufficient information not cognizable as a federal due process claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).