Kentucky Refining Co. v. Waggener

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, on remand, Commerce must explain the relevance of any inducement or evasion considerations and must address how using AFA to calculate a cooperating party's rate where that rate has no impact on the non-cooperating party is reasonable
• “Commerce shall fill in the gaps with ‘facts otherwise available’ if any respondent significantly impedes the Department’s ability to conduct a proceeding.” (citing Nippon Steel, 337 F.3d at 1381)
• final results of antidumping duty admin, rev.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).