Kentucky Institution for Blind v. City of Louisville

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that damages are a remedy, not a substantive claim for relief
• allowing the taking of a deposition and leave to amend the complaint to properly allege reliance
• “The seriousness of deficiencies should be 16 measured by the effect the error has in contravening the purposes of the statutes in 17 question”
• “Plaintiffs would need to establish that the Infuse Device should have been designed in a manner different than that approved by the FDA”
• failure-to-warn claim based on off-label promotion preempted because it “seeks to impose on Defendants a duty to provide warnings beyond those already outlined by the FDA, which Riegel prohibits”
• “Ramirez has been rejected — for good reason — by numerous courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).