Kentucky Independent Oil Co. v. Thiel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Nehemiah “was cited by the Supreme Court in Burnham as one of the few opinions that have ‘erroneously’ found the practice of in-state service of process unconstitutional.” (quoting Burnham, 495 U.S. at 615)
• holding Daimler did not alter the consent to jurisdiction resulting from compliance with the business registration statutes
• holding Daimler did not alter the consent to jurisdiction resulting from compliance with the business registration statutes
• concluding the defendant consented to being sued in New Jersey by conceding it was registered to do business and had a registered agent in the state for service of process
• concluding the defendant consented to being sued in New Jersey by conceding it was registered to do business and had a registered agent in the state for service of process
• determining that Daimler \did not disturb the consent by-in-state service rule.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).