Skip to main content
· 3/19/1920

Kentucky Glycerine Co. v. Clouse

Citations

  • 187 Ky. 484
  • 219 S.W. 788
  • 1920 Ky. LEXIS 149

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that courts routinely dismiss declaratory judgment claims as duplicative of substantive claims and even if the requested relief differs
  • noting that “[i]n this district, courts commonly exercise [their] discretion” to dismiss claims for declaratory relief “where the claim for declaratory judgment substantially overlaps with [other] substantive claims” and collecting cases
  • dismissing a declaratory judgment claim as duplicative, where the substantive legal issue was the same as in the breach of contract count
  • finding claim for a declaratory judgment that plaintiff was discharged without cause redundant to a breach of contract claim because the legal issue is the same in both counts
  • finding claim for a declaratory judgment that plaintiff was discharged without cause redundant to a breach of contract claim because the legal issue is the same in both counts
  • “This Court has discretion to decline to hear a declaratory judgment action even if it considers the action justiciable.” (citing Tempco Elec. Heater Corp. v. Omega Eng'g, Inc., 819 F.2d 746, 747 (7th Cir.1987))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.