Kentucky Fried Chicken of Bowling Green, Inc. v. Sanders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming dismissal of defamation complaint where newspaper published derogatory statement about KFC’s gravy because there was “nothing in the present article which identified” or made “direct reference to” plaintiff’s particular restaurant
• affirming dismissal of defamation complaint where newspaper published derogatory statement about KFC’s gravy because there was “nothing in the present article which identified” or made “direct reference to” plaintiff’s particular restaurant
• affirming dismissal of defamation complaint where newspaper published derogatory statement about KFC’s gravy because there was “nothing in the present article which identified” or made “direct reference to” plaintiff’s particular restaurant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).