Kentucky Carbon Corp. v. Interior Board of Mine Operations Appeals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that proof of union’s breach of duty to fairly represent is an “essential element” of employee’s hybrid suit
• holding that orders and rulings that merge with consent judgments “are subject to the general rule of non-appealability”
• noting the well-accepted rule that a party generally may not appeal from a consent judgment
• noting the well-accepted rule that a party generally may not appeal from a consent judgment
• noting the well-accepted rule that a party generally may not appeal from a consent judgment
• noting the well-accepted rule that a party generally may not appeal from a consent judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).