Kent v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that brief explanation for shortened notice and termination can satisfy “brief statement” requirement
• “The case law makes clear tbab the determining factor on the foreseeability issue is whether the triggering event was probable or possible.”
• “[T]he ‘immediate precipitant of the decision to terminate employees’ was [the lender’s] refusal to extend forbearance,” even though there were “other reasons” for the lender’s refusal and employer’s financial difficulties.
• “[T]he ‘immediate precipitant of the decision to terminate employees’ was [the lender’s] refusal to extend forbearance,” even though there were “other reasons” for the lender’s refusal and employer’s financial difficulties.
• “[T]he ‘immediate precipitant of the decision to terminate employees’ was [the lender’s] refusal to extend forbearance,” even though there were “other reasons” for the lender’s refusal and the employer’s financial difficulties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).