· 6/20/1997
Kent Corp. v. Hale
Citations
- 699 So. 2d 954
- 1997 WL 340702
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- plaintiff did not establish essential element of having been discharged because he made decision to discontinue working for employer
- employee who chose to discontinue his employment could not maintain retaliatory-discharge action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hooper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.