Skip to main content
· 6/20/1997

Kent Corp. v. Hale

Citations

  • 699 So. 2d 954
  • 1997 WL 340702

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff did not establish essential element of having been discharged because he made decision to discontinue working for employer
  • employee who chose to discontinue his employment could not maintain retaliatory-discharge action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hooper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.