Kent A. Sommer and Andrea Sommer v. G. William Davis and Charles G. Norton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Sommer abandoned any arguments challenging the district court’s award of summary judgment to defendant because the arguments were not raised in Sommer’s opening brief
• holding that an issue is abandoned if a party does not present any argument addressing the issue in his brief
• holding that plaintiffs abandoned an issue on appea l by not presenting any argument on it in their briefs
• holding that an issue is abandoned if a party does not present any argument addressing the issue in his brief
• holding that an issue is abandoned if a party does not present any argument respecting the issue in his brief
• holding that the appellants abandoned an issue for purposes of appeal where they failed to argue it in their briefs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).