Kenny v. Talbot

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, pre-Glazer, that law firm that was a “debt collector” only for the limited purposes of 15 U.S.C. §1692f(6) was not made subject to the entire FDCPA because of the “debt collector” warnings on its letters
• holding, pre-Glazer, that law firm that was a \debt collector\ only for the limited purposes of 15 U.S.C. § 1692f(6) was not made subject to the entire FDCPA because of the \debt collector\ warnings on its letters

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).