N.D. California· 6/2/2008
Kenny v. Supercuts, Inc.
Citations
- 252 F.R.D. 641
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43073
- 2008 WL 2265194
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that California law only requires the employer to provide a meal 13 period and does not impose liability “for a failure to ensure that an employee actually availed 14 herself of the meal period”
- denying class certification where the plaintiffs theory was that “stores were too busy to give employees a meaningful opportunity to take breaks” as to prove the claim would require “an individual inquiry into each store, each shift, each employee”
- “it is apparent that plaintiff 7 has failed to identify any theory of liability that presents a common question.”
- “Cicairos is not persuasive authority for the proposition that employers must ensure that their employees take meal breaks and this Court is not bound by the court of appeals’ decision.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Alberts v. Aurora Behavioral Health CareCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-10-16· cited 29×
- Norris-Wilson v. Delta-T Group, Inc.S.D. California· 2010-09-30· cited 23×
- Gonzalez v. Millard Mall Services, Inc.S.D. California· 2012-03-02· cited 21×
- Perez v. Safety-Kleen System, Inc.N.D. California· 2008-07-28· cited 14×
- Wren v. RGIS Inventory SpecialistsN.D. California· 2009-02-06· cited 11×
- Amiri v. Cox Communications California, LLCC.D. California· 2017-09-27· cited 9×
- Melton v. Carolina Power & Light Co.D. South Carolina· 2012-06-25· cited 7×
- Driscoll v. Granite Rock Co.California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2016-11-30· cited 4×
- Salazar v. Avis Budget Group, Inc.S.D. California· 2008-07-02· cited 3×
- Valenzuela v. Giumarra Vineyards Corp.E.D. California· 2009-03-31· cited 1×
- Hernandez v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2010-10-28
- Driscoll v. Granite RockCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-11-30
- Driscoll v. Granite Rock CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-12-22
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
- Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court· 1996-12-19· cited 236×
- Lana Guebara, Cross-Appellee v. Allstate Insurance CompanyNinth Circuit· 2001-01-12· cited 172×
- Dukes v. Wal-Mart, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2007-12-11· cited 100×
- Cicairos v. Summit Logistics, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2005-10-27· cited 83×
- White v. Starbucks Corp.N.D. California· 2007-07-02· cited 39×
- Brown v. Federal Express Corp.C.D. California· 2008-02-26· cited 31×
- Conley v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal· 2005-07-21· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.