Kenneth W. Wright v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, a Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily waived Title VII claims but not future ERISA claims
• holding that § 1113 only applies to actions arising out of violations of §§ 1101–12 regarding financial solvency or accountability and not denial of benefits
• holding that section 1113 did not apply to a claim for benefits
• “We review a district court’s ruling on the applicability of a[n] [ERISA] statute of limitations de novo.”
• “There is no indication in the record, and W right does not allege, his education and business experience are below average.”
• limitations period applicable to complaint charging denial of disability benefits was state limitations period for actions on written contracts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).