Kenneth v. Angell v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that BIA clearly excludes only “those injuries directly resulting from the inspection, repair, or servicing of railroad equipment located at a maintenance facility.”
• train in use where plaintiff was injured while uncoupling the readied engine in preparation for moving it to a nearby track to pull another train within a few hours
• locomotive being moved “to another track .... to later pull a train” suggests that the locomotive “was not in need of further repair or servicing” and was “in use”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).