Kenneth S. Uston v. Airport Casino, Inc., a Corporation Dba Marina Casino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that relationship between casino owner and prospective gambler did not implicate “[t]he policies upon which the innkeeper’s special common law duties rested,” and hence exclusion of gambler from casino was acceptable
• recognizing that SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 6 (0
• recognizing that SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 6 (0
• \[T]hey were not acting in [an innkeeper] capacity in their dealings with [the plaintiff]. The relationship was. . . one of casino owner and prospective gambler. The policies upon which the innkeeper's special common law duties rested are not present in such a relationship.\
• \[T]hey were not acting in [an innkeeper] capacity in their dealings with [the plaintiff]. The relationship was. . . one of casino owner and prospective gambler. The policies upon which the innkeeper's special common law duties rested are not present in such a relationship.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).