Kenneth S. Tipton v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that remand to attach an habitual offender enhancement to a specific conviction was unnecessary where the defendant’s convictions and the length of the enhancement revealed that it could only be attached to one of the two convictions
• court must specifiy which conviction is to be enhanced
• defendant fired a weapon into an uninhabited home

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).