Kenneth R. Shockley v. Mary Spinner Jones and Terry McLain

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the court improperly dismissed the complaint sua sponte but finding that remand would be futile because his proposed amended complaint did not state a claim either
• explaining that the court No. 18-3472 11 improperly dismissed the complaint sua sponte but finding that remand would be futile because his proposed amended complaint did not state a claim either

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).