· 2/28/2006
Kenneth R. Henderson v. Les Munn, in His Individual Capacity
Citations
- 439 F.3d 497
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 5010
- 2006 WL 463171
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that pepper spray was an excessive use of force in response to a handcuffed detainee
- concluding that the “negligible severity” of plaintiff’s offenses, including “giving a false name, resisting arrest, public intoxication, and the two outstanding warrants for failure to appear,” did not “tip the scales of reasonableness” in the officer’s favor
- concluding pepper spraying a restrained and subdued suspect may have been a gratuitous and completely unnecessary act of violence which clearly violated the Fourth Amendment, but concluding issues of fact (whether suspect was subdued, for example
- denying qualified immunity where officer pepper sprayed arrestee who was lying face down with both arms handcuffed behind his back and no longer resisting arrest
- denying qualified immunity to an officer who pepper-sprayed a suspect posing “little or no threat” to anyone’s safety
- “when a person is subdued and restrained with handcuffs, a ‘gratuitous and completely unnecessary act of violence’ is unreasonable and violates the Fourth Amendment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arnold, Beam, Riley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.