Skip to main content
· 4/28/2003

Kenneth Parker v. Reda, C.O., Norfleet, C.O., Krusen, Sgt. & Rita A. Brannen, and Estate of Charles Harrison, Sing Sing Corr. Fac. & C. Grainer, Supt.

Citations

  • 327 F.3d 211
  • 61 Fed. R. Serv. 306
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 8011
  • 2003 WL 1957440

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming admission of an officer’s testimony from a memorandum satisfying the requirements of a recorded recollection even if it did not satisfy the requirements of the business records exception to the hearsay rule
  • affirming admission of an officer’s testimony from a memorandum satisfying the requirements of a recorded recollection even if it did not satisfy the requirements of the business records exception to the hearsay rule
  • \[I]t is sufficient if the witness testifies that he knows that a record of this type is correct because it was his habit or practice to record such matters accurately .\ (emphasis added

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Per Curiam, Straub, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.