Skip to main content
· 3/10/2022

Kenneth Edward Carter v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the limited view of a glassine bag, the contents of which were not discernible, and [defendant’s] furtive gesture in concealing it in his pants, were insufficient” to provide probable cause for arrest
  • finding that the Commonwealth’s application for interlocutory appeal was filed within a reasonable time, partly due to the fact that its notice of appeal was filed within six days of the judge’s order on the motion to suppress
  • viewing an -object which may be used for lawful as well as unlawful purposes not sufficient'to provide probable causé to arrest individual possessing object; officer’s training and experience not sufficient to overcome this deficiency
  • viewing an object which may be used for lawful as well as unlawful purposes not sufficient to provide probable cause to arrest individual possessing object; officer’s training and experience not sufficient to overcome this deficiency
  • viewing an object which may be used for lawful as well as unlawful purposes not sufficient to provide probable cause to arrest individual possessing object; officer’s training and experience not sufficient to overcome this deficiency
  • although probable cause had not arisen at time of initial stop and investigation, events subsequent to stop provided sufficient probable cause to arrest defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.