Kenneth D. Widgren, Jr. And Kenneth D. Widgren, Sr. v. Maple Grove Township H. Wayne Beldo Louis Lenz, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a code enforcement officer did not violate the Fourth Amendment when he posted a violation notice on the front door of a house
• finding that a picnic table, a fire pit, and pruned trees sufficient to indicate an area is within curtilage
• noting that the property assessor “did not touch enter or look into the house.”
• noting that the property assessor \did not touch enter or look into the house.\
• finding that although a disputed “area was not within an enclosure, a clear line marked the mowed portion from the surrounding area that had not been cleared.”
• stating that “tax appraisers would be well advised to obtain consent or a warrant as a matter of course before breaching the curtilage because, in many instances, such an intrusion may be a Fourth Amendment search”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).