· 6/12/1989
Kenneth D. Oxborrow, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Norman Carlson, Respondents-Appellants/cross-Appellees
Citations
- 877 F.2d 1395
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing an exception to this rule in the context of federal habeas corpus where the state court’s interpretation of state law “is untenable or amounts to a subterfuge to avoid federal review of a constitutional violation” (citation omitted)
- “An unforeseeable, albeit legitimate, construction of a state law by the courts may not be retroactively applied to a defen- dant.”
- “[E]rrors of state law do not 4 concern us unless they rise to the level of a constitutional violation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alarcon, Beezer, Aguilar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.