Skip to main content
· 6/12/1989

Kenneth D. Oxborrow, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Kenneth O. Eikenberry, Norman Carlson, Respondents-Appellants/cross-Appellees

Citations

  • 877 F.2d 1395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing an exception to this rule in the context of federal habeas corpus where the state court’s interpretation of state law “is untenable or amounts to a subterfuge to avoid federal review of a constitutional violation” (citation omitted)
  • “An unforeseeable, albeit legitimate, construction of a state law by the courts may not be retroactively applied to a defen- dant.”
  • “[E]rrors of state law do not 4 concern us unless they rise to the level of a constitutional violation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarcon, Beezer, Aguilar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.