Kenner v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Chatham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding finding that plaintiffs had not demonstrated standing based on impaired visual interests even though relevant zoning by-law protected aesthetic interests and plaintiffs, as abutters, enjoyed presumptive standing
• plaintiff's burden to show \particularized injury\ as result of alleged zoning infraction; 10 \[a]ggrievement requires a showing of more than minimal or slightly appreciable harm\
• plaintiffs required to show \more than minimal or slightly appreciable harm\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).