Skip to main content
· 10/21/2013

Kenner v. Kelly

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 493
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 319
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3234
  • 571 U.S. 975
  • 2013 WL 5309133
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that interest rates for claims that arise out of federal law are governed by federal rules, and interest rates for claims that arise out of state law are governed by state rules
  • stating that “look[ing] to the source of the law underlying plaintiff’s claims” is “the proper framework” for this analysis, and state law is applicable to determining the rate of interest in a § 544(b) fraudulent transfer recovery
  • endorsing the framework employed by courts in this Circuit of determining the rate of prejudgment interest by \look[ing] to the source of law underlying [the] claims\
  • “[A] suit dismissed without prejudice ... is treated for statute of limitations purposes as if it had never been filed[.]”
  • “The decision whether to grant prejudgment interest and the rate used if such interest is granted are matters confided to the district court’s broad discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.