Skip to main content
· 3/11/1887

Kennemore v. Kennemore

Citations

  • 26 S.C. 251
  • 1 S.E. 881
  • 1887 S.C. LEXIS 27

Syllabus

<p>1. A witness, once having an interest and a nominal party defendant to the action, is not incompetent to testify in behalf of defendants to transactions between a person deceased, under whom the plaintiffs claim, and a third person.</p> <p>2. Circuit Judge concurred with referee that there had been a parol partition. Such concurrence in findings of fact in the court below is rarely disturbed, and was approved in this case.</p> <p>3. A parol partition is binding upon the parties if there is sufficient proof of part performance to take it out of the statute of frauds; and actual possession is the most satisfactory evidence of part performance.</p>

Judges: McGowan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.