Kennedy v. Sale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the employees were the primary intended beneficiaries of an insurance policy purchased by their employer and, therefore, were consumers
• concluding that the employees were the primary intended beneficiaries of an insurance policy purchased by their employer and, therefore, were consumers
• concluding that the employees were the primary intended beneficiaries of an insurance policy purchased by their employer and, therefore, were consumers
• concluding that the employees were the primary intended beneficiaries of an insurance policy purchased by their employer and, therefore, were consumers
• holding that even though employee did not “seek” group medical insurance coverage which had been negotiated by his employer, he did “acquire” those benefits when he was covered by the policy’s provisions
• holding that \consumer\ can be anyone who acquires goods that provide basis for DTPA complaint even if goods were paid for by someone other than plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).