California Supreme Court· 7/5/1946
Kennedy v. Ross
Citations
- 28 Cal. 2d 569
- 170 P.2d 904
- 1946 Cal. LEXIS 237
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- contract with an engineer to furnish engineering and architectural plans for a proposed sewage and sludge treatment and disposal plant
- contract with an engineer to furnish engineering and architectural plans for a proposed sewage and sludge treatment and disposal plant
- public bidding does not apply where competitive proposals work an incongruity and are unavailing as affecting the final result, or where it is practically impossible to observe such forms
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shenk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Harman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-05-15· cited 115×
- City of Glendale v. TrondsenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1957-03-12· cited 74×
- City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court· 1949-12-28· cited 64×
- Professional Engineers v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-05-15· cited 60×
- City of Inglewood-Los Angeles County Civic Center Authority v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-09-06· cited 59×
- California State Employees' Ass'n v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-04-13· cited 37×
- Graydon v. Pasadena Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-03-25· cited 35×
- Jaynes v. StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1961-06-12· cited 32×
- Mefford v. City of TulareCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1951-03-19· cited 30×
- California State Employees' v. State of Calif.California Court of Appeal· 1988-03-22· cited 29×
- People v. ParmarCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-01-30· cited 24×
- State Ex Rel. Williams v. MusgraveIdaho Supreme Court· 1962-02-02· cited 21×
- Butler v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1951-05-14· cited 14×
- Diamond International Corp. v. BoasCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-05-15· cited 14×
- Air Cal, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoNinth Circuit· 1989-01-17· cited 13×
- Cobb v. Pasadena City Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1955-06-24· cited 12×
- Handler v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1952-07-11· cited 11×
- Darley v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-10-19· cited 11×
- Eller Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-02-01· cited 10×
- Hiller v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1961-12-06· cited 10×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1939-10-26· cited 89×
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1937-06-24· cited 58×
- The City of Oakland v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1940-05-28· cited 48×
- City & County of San Francisco v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-03-12· cited 35×
- Powell v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1944-01-13· cited 13×
Other cases named Kennedy v. Ross
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.