Skip to main content
· 1/5/1891

Kennedy v. Crawford

Citations

  • 138 Pa. 561
  • 21 A. 19
  • 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1134

Syllabus

<p>[To be reported.]</p> <p>(«) An oil lease, reserving royalty, provided that the lessee should commence drilling a well within a specified time and “ prosecute said drilling with duo diligence to success or abandonment; and, should oil or gas not be pumped or excavated in paying quantities on or before June 27,1886, then this lease to be null and void.” A subsequent clause made the violation of any stipulation in the lease a cause of forfeiture:</p> <p>1. The drilling could not be regarded as prosecuted to success so long as no actual product of oil or gas was obtained; and the lessee, after drilling into the oil-bearing rock, and finding oil, for the production of which it was necessary to pump the well, was bound by his covenant to exercise due diligence in ascertaining whether the oil could be produced in paying quantities, and, if it could be, in effecting such production.</p> <p>2. The provision respecting the production of oil or gas on or before June 27, 1886, did not give the lessee a discretion to suspend operations indefinitely, after drilling the well, provided he effected such production by the date named; and, if, having completed such drilling in December 1885, he ceased operations for three months thereafter, making no effort during that period to produce oil, he thereby incurred a forfeiture.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • transferring a count against a local agency from this court’s original jurisdiction to the court of common pleas
  • trial court may address the affirmative defense of immunity raised as a preliminary objection if the defense is apparent on the face of the pleading or where the plaintiff has not objected
  • “Since governmental immunity under Section 8541 of the Judicial Code extends only to liability for damages, Petitioner must be permitted to pursue his claim, against the [Philadelphia Parking Authority] for injunctive relief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark, Gkeen, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.