Skip to main content
· 10/2/1980

Kennedy v. City of Seattle

Citations

  • 617 P.2d 713
  • 94 Wash. 2d 376
  • 1980 Wash. LEXIS 1388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it would be \manifestly unjust\ to use collateral estoppel to allow the constitutionality of a statute to be determined by an unappealed municipal court ruling
  • holding that it would be “manifestly unjust” to use collateral estoppel to allow the constitutionality of a statute to be determined by an unappealed municipal court ruling
  • holding that an appellate court is the most appropriate forum to decide matters of constitutionality
  • issues may be of sufficient public importance to bar the use of collateral estoppel
  • issues may be of sufficient public importance to bar the use of collateral estoppel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dolliver

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.