· 10/2/1980
Kennedy v. City of Seattle
Citations
- 617 P.2d 713
- 94 Wash. 2d 376
- 1980 Wash. LEXIS 1388
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that it would be \manifestly unjust\ to use collateral estoppel to allow the constitutionality of a statute to be determined by an unappealed municipal court ruling
- holding that it would be “manifestly unjust” to use collateral estoppel to allow the constitutionality of a statute to be determined by an unappealed municipal court ruling
- holding that an appellate court is the most appropriate forum to decide matters of constitutionality
- issues may be of sufficient public importance to bar the use of collateral estoppel
- issues may be of sufficient public importance to bar the use of collateral estoppel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dolliver
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.