Skip to main content
· 5/27/1993

Kenly v. Ukegawa

Citations

  • 16 Cal. App. 4th 49
  • 19 Cal. Rptr. 2d 771
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3964
  • 1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a ratio between actual damages and punitive damages is one factor to be considered, along with the reprehensibility of the defendant’s conduct and the defendant’s wealth
  • “under the out-of-pocket approach, the defrauded 9 party receives only the difference between the value of the 10 property received and the amount he paid”
  • “under the out-of-pocket approach, the defrauded 9 party receives only the difference between the value of the 10 property received and the amount he paid”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Froehlich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.