Kenevan v. Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the terms of its Medigap policy ambiguous with regard to whether insurer or insured bore the cost of a decrease in the Medicare reimbursement rate and that plaintiffs stated an independent cause of action in fraud
• “If a court finds that [a contract] is ambiguous, it must consider extrinsic evidence to assist it in determining the mutual intent of the parties in entering the contract.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).